[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14323672#comment-14323672
 ] 

Rakesh R commented on ZOOKEEPER-2094:
-------------------------------------

Thanks [~iandi]. I have added few review comments in [Review 
Board|https://reviews.apache.org/r/30753/diff/#], please have a look. 

I have one general suggestion, the patch looks very big. I understand this is 
required to test the complete feature, but there could be chances of missing 
the focus of the reviewer. Can we think of splitting into smaller sub-tasks. 
This would be helpful to the reviewers and push one by one. What others opinion?

Subtasks would be like,
# Document SSL feature on Netty
# Provide implementation of X509 AuthenticationProvider
# Modify ZooKeeper NettyServer to support SSL
# Modify ZooKeeper client cnxn to support SSL
# Modify ZooKeeperServerMain to support SSL
# Modify FourLetterWord to support SSL

Also, feel free to modify the subject line if requires.

> SSL feature on Netty
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2094
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2094
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: server
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.6, 3.5.0
>            Reporter: Ian Dimayuga
>            Assignee: Ian Dimayuga
>             Fix For: 3.5.1, 3.6.0
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2094-git-apply.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2094.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-2094.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2094.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2094.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-2094.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2094.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2094.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-2094.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2094.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2094.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-2094.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2094.patch, test.cert, testKeyStore.jks, 
> testTrustStore.jks, testUntrustedKeyStore.jks
>
>
> Add SSL handler to Netty pipeline, and a default X509AuthenticationProvider 
> to perform authentication.
> Review board: 
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30753/diff/#



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to