OK. I have modified ZK cwiki page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToRelease
directly. Please review the newly added lines in orange color to understand
the changes. The following sections has been modified:

   - *Updating the release branch -> modified steps **1, 4, 10, 11*
   - *Building -> modified step 9*
   - *Publishing -> modified step 1*

Thanks,
Rakesh

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:

> Perhaps you can make the changes directly on the wiki page as a duplicate
> line item under the original in a different color? It's hard for me to
> really follow, esp as it's not a 1:1 replacement iiuc. Could you try
> editing the wiki directly to start with, leave the original line and add
> the new line(s) but in another color or some other indication?
>
> Thanks Rakesh.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > As we all know, 3.4.10 release is the first ZooKeeper release after the
> > github repository migration. I have tried an attempt to modify the steps
> > described in the '
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToRelease' page
> > to
> > make the release. Since this release is from an already created branch, I
> > have focused only the branch related parts in cwiki and below sections in
> > the page needed changes like,
> >
> >
> > *Updating the release branch*
> > 1. Check out the branch with:
> > git clone -b branch-X.Y
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git
> >
> > 2. I'm skipping this step, which is not required now.
> >
> > 4. Update CHANGES.txt with the committed jira details. As we follow PR
> > merging, most of the jira info is not updated in this file. I believe
> > release manager need to update this file to capture the jira details
> marked
> > for that release.
> >
> > 10. Commit these changes.
> > git commit -a -m "Preparing for release X.Y.Z"
> > git push <remote> <branch>
> >
> > 11. Tag the release candidate (R is the release candidate number, and
> > starts from 0):
> > git tag -s release-X.Y.Z-rcR -m "ZooKeeper X.Y.Z-rcR release."
> >
> > Push the newly created rc tag to the remote repo.
> > git push <remote> release-X.Y.Z-rcR
> >
> >
> > *Building*
> > 9. Call for a release vote on dev
> >           In the release candidate dev mail format, it needs to change
> the
> > tag like,
> >
> >           "The RC tag in git to be voted upon: release-X.Y.Z-rcR"
> >
> >
> > *Publishing*
> > 1. Tag the release:
> > git tag -s release-X.Y.Z -m "ZooKeeper X.Y.Z release."
> >
> > Push the newly created release tag to the remote repo.
> > git push <remote> release-X.Y.Z
> >
> >
> > I'd like to know whether I'm going in the right direction and start
> cutting
> > the 3.4.10 release by following this approach. Thanks!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rakesh
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <
> rake...@apache.org
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for pointing this jira. I will take a look at this.
> > >
> > > Rakesh
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Edward Ribeiro <
> > edward.ribe...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Rakesh,
> > >>
> > >> Thansk for stepping up to this task! Pretty cool! :)
> > >>
> > >> Do you think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2573 is
> > >> worth
> > >> targeting 3.4.10 too?
> > >>
> > >> Edward
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <
> > rake...@apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi All,
> > >> >
> > >> > I hope to cut an RC in a week - giving some more time for your
> > favorite
> > >> > outstanding blocker/critical issues. Will start moving out any
> tickets
> > >> that
> > >> > are not blockers and/or won’t fit the timeline - there are 1
> blocker,
> > 5
> > >> > critical, 15 major, 7 minor tickets outstanding as of now.
> Appreciate
> > >> your
> > >> > support in releasing 3.4.10 version. Thanks!
> > >> >
> > >> > Please find the open issues marked for 3.4.10 release here,
> > >> > https://goo.gl/XdraFA
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Rakesh
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <
> > >> rake...@apache.org>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hi All,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I am interested in going through the release process as the RM.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Overall, I could see total 41 issues marked for 3.4.10 release as
> of
> > >> now,
> > >> > > which includes 4 blockers, 5 critical, 20 major and 12 minor
> > issues. I
> > >> > > count 9 issues fixed/committed already for 3.4.10 which includes 1
> > >> > blocker
> > >> > > and 1 critical(security related) issue. ZOOKEEPER-1045 is a much
> > >> awaited
> > >> > > one and the feature code is committed. I think it is a good time
> to
> > >> > > initiate the discussion of 3.4.10 release processes.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please find the issues marked for 3.4.10 release here,
> > >> > > https://goo.gl/FfbpVG
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Currently, I'm focusing on updating ZOOKEEPER-1045 feature details
> > >> into
> > >> > > our project cwiki and related ZOOKEEPER-2479 improvement jira. I'd
> > >> like
> > >> > to
> > >> > > include ZOOKEEPER-2383 into this release if everyone agrees.
> > >> Appreciate
> > >> > > your help in reviewing the jira patches and making it stable for
> > >> release.
> > >> > > Also, please feel free to push your favorite issues ahead of
> 3.4.10
> > >> > release.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I hope with the community support, we should be able to close all
> > >> > > necessary blockers/critical issues soon. Kindly requesting
> everyone
> > to
> > >> > look
> > >> > > at the issues marked for 3.4.10 and push these asap or can be
> pushed
> > >> out
> > >> > to
> > >> > > 3.4.11.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Imp: Since we moved to github repository, the release procedure
> > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/
> HowToRelease
> > >> > > requires changes. Appreciate your help in this part. Thanks!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please let me know your thoughts on the plan.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks,
> > >> > > Rakesh
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to