maven build is failing for me - should it? I can't remember if we
"officially" supported maven in 3.5?

[phunt:apache-zookeeper-3.5.10] $ mvn --version
Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0)
Maven home: /opt/homebrew/Cellar/maven/3.8.5/libexec
Java version: 18.0.1, vendor: Homebrew, runtime:
/opt/homebrew/Cellar/openjdk/18.0.1/libexec/openjdk.jdk/Contents/Home
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "mac os x", version: "12.3.1", arch: "aarch64", family: "mac"

mvn clean install -DskipTests
....
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:4.1.0:bundle (build bundle) on project
zookeeper-jute: Execution build bundle of goal
org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:4.1.0:bundle failed.:
ConcurrentModificationException -> [Help 1]

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 7:56 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry for the late reply.
> I will test the RC tomorrow
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno gio 26 mag 2022 alle ore 16:29 Szalay-Bekő Máté
> <szalay.beko.m...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Thank you Chris for the quick vote!
> >
> > Despite my earlier attempt to mislead everyone (I made a copy-paste error
> > and wrote 'non-binding' when I voted), we already have two binding +1 for
> > this release.
> > If some of you have the time, please test the RC and vote.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Mate
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 9:02 AM Szalay-Bekő Máté <
> szalay.beko.m...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > - I built the source code (-Pfull-build) on Ubuntu 20.04 using OpenJDK
> > > 8u212 and maven 3.6.3.
> > > - all the unit tests passed (both Java and C-client).
> > > - I also built and executed unit tests for zkpython
> > > - checkstyle and spotbugs passed
> > > - apache-rat passed
> > > - owasp (CVE check) passed
> > > - I executed quick rolling-upgrade tests (using
> > > https://github.com/symat/zk-rolling-upgrade-test):
> > >   - rolling upgrade from 3.5.9  to 3.5.10
> > >   - rolling upgrade from 3.5.10 to 3.6.3
> > >   - rolling upgrade from 3.5.10 to 3.7.1
> > >   - rolling upgrade from 3.7.0  to 3.8.0
> > > - check generated documentation
> > > - compared generated release notes (
> > >
> https://people.apache.org/~symat/zookeeper-3.5.10-rc0/website/releasenotes.html
> )
> > > with Jira (
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801&version=12349434
> > > )
> > > - check the signature and checksum of the artifacts
> > > - run some smoke tests using both the binary distribution
> > > (apache-zookeeper-3.5.10-bin.tar.gz) and on a freshly compiled version
> > > (based on apache-zookeeper-3.5.10.tar.gz)
> > >
> > > The C-client tests can be tricky (and annoying) sometimes. On docker
> some
> > > of them fail for me more frequently (also IPV6 tests can be tricky to
> setup
> > > on docker+mac). Also sometimes they leave ZooKeeper processes open
> after a
> > > test failure, and these are preventing later test runs to pass. Worth
> to
> > > take a look and kill these before running the C tests again. In the
> end I
> > > got all of them to pass on Ubuntu 20.04 and gcc 9.4.0 (using native
> ubuntu,
> > > not mac+docker), having all the recommended ubuntu packages installed (
> > > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/master/README_packaging.md).
> But
> > > would be nice to improve our test quality here... (unfortunately I
> don't
> > > think more recent branches would be in a much better shape)
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Mate
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 12:10 AM Chris Nauroth <cnaur...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (binding)
> > >>
> > >> - Verified all checksums.
> > >> - Verified all signatures.
> > >> - Built from source, including native code on Linux.
> > >> - Tests passed.
> > >> - Ran several small samples successfully.
> > >>
> > >> I'm seeing failures in the cppunit tests in zookeeper-client-c. The
> same
> > >> failures reproduce on version 3.5.9 though, so it's not related to
> this
> > >> release. I assume this is a configuration issue I need to diagnose in
> my
> > >> environment.
> > >>
> > >> Chris Nauroth
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 2:31 AM Szalay-Bekő Máté <
> > >> szalay.beko.m...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.5.10. It fixes 43 issues,
> > >> > including CVE fixes, log4j1 removal (by default using reload4j from
> now)
> > >> > and various other bug fixes (thread leaks, data corruption,
> snapshotting
> > >> > and SASL related fixes).
> > >> >
> > >> > Please note, we announced 3.5 to be EOL from June 1st 2022, so most
> > >> likely
> > >> > this will be our
> > >> > last 3.5 release.
> > >> >
> > >> > The full release notes is available at:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801&version=12349434
> > >> >
> > >> > *** Please download, test and vote by May 27th 2022, 23:59 UTC+0.
> ***
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Source files:
> > >> > https://people.apache.org/~symat/zookeeper-3.5.10-rc0/
> > >> >
> > >> > Maven staging repo:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/zookeeper/3.5.10/
> > >> >
> > >> > The release candidate tag in git to be voted upon:
> release-3.5.10-rc0
> > >> >
> > >> > ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> release:
> > >> > https://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS
> > >> >
> > >> > The staging version of the website is:
> > >> > https://people.apache.org/~symat/zookeeper-3.5.10-rc0/website/
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Should we release this candidate?
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Best regards,
> > >> > Máté
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
>

Reply via email to