If more time is truly needed, we can go over, and anything not directly related to the subject at hand can be discussed by the interested parties at a later time.
But let's start with a target of half an hour - hopefully that will keep things focused. -- Steve On Jul 29, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > I don't think 30 minutes will be enough, I would plead for an hour. But as > time passes by we will gather some experience and draw our conclusions of > this. :) > > Patrick > > On Jul 29, 2011, at 12:49 AM, Jordan wrote: > >> I think Colin's suggestion for more than one meeting would be best. Normally >> these things proceed for well over 2 hours, which is quite a length of time, >> especially considering it's very late at night for some tuning in and that >> many attendees have not even stuck around that long in the past. >> >> Trying to break it up into 30-45 minute meetings covering defined topics in >> each is likely going to be better for everyone. Those who want to discuss a >> particular topic won't have to wade through hours of other material, those >> who are up late to attend will not have to extend that into wee hours of the >> night, and we're likely to get more focused arguments and results from a >> shorter meeting than a ridiculously long one. >> >> Jordan > >
