Steve: Take a look at http://trac.adium.im/attachment/wiki/AdiumMeetings/2011-08-30/Adium%20meeting%20log%20August%2030%2C%202010.txt start at line 120.
…Like that? -Eric On Sep 6, 2011, at 8:06 PM, Stephen Holt wrote: > My Suggestion is in line with the plan to move to time based releases. > > Branching for releases makes no sense under that policy. > > Effectively, we move from shipping "when it's done" to shipping "what is done" > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 6, 2011, at 5:01 PM, David Smith <catfish....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I disagree. The concept of "trunk" focuses testing a lot. I know when >> we had a few feature branches going I immediately set up my own branch >> that I merged them all to so I could test more than one thing at once. >> >> David >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Stephen Holt <sh...@adium.im> wrote: >>> I think we should stop branching releases entirely. >>> >>> Feature work done in branches, merged+intergated into the mainline when >>> stable. New features released the next release after they're done. >>> (Releases are tagged for historical reasons, of course) >>> >>> We've have a DVCS for several years, let's start developing like we have >>> one. >>> >>> -- >>> Steve >>> >>> On Sep 6, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Eric Richie wrote: >>> >>>> Now that we've got 1.4.3 out the door, I think it's time we go ahead and >>>> branch 1.5. >>>> >>>> Any objections? >>>> >>>> -Eric >>> >>> >>> >> >
