On Sep 6, 2011, at 6:18 PM, Evan Schoenberg, M.D. wrote: > > On Sep 6, 2011, at 7:01 PM, David Smith wrote: > >> I disagree. The concept of "trunk" focuses testing a lot. I know when >> we had a few feature branches going I immediately set up my own branch >> that I merged them all to so I could test more than one thing at once. > > Branch early, merge early may be a fine approach. I'm just unclear what > advantage branching 1.5 (and, as a result, making trunk 1.6hg) would have at > this time. > > -Evan
+1 As for testing, this is why we're trying to set up nightly builds for n-branches. I think a great goal would be to have trunk releasable at any arbitrary time, provided a period for localization and beta testing.
