On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Eric Richie <e...@adium.im> wrote: > On Sep 6, 2011, at 9:42 PM, David Smith wrote: > > > > > On Sep 6, 2011, at 6:26 PM, Stephen Holt <sh...@adium.im> wrote: > > > On Sep 6, 2011, at 6:18 PM, Evan Schoenberg, M.D. wrote: > > On Sep 6, 2011, at 7:01 PM, David Smith wrote: > > I disagree. The concept of "trunk" focuses testing a lot. I know when > we had a few feature branches going I immediately set up my own branch > that I merged them all to so I could test more than one thing at once. > > Branch early, merge early may be a fine approach. I'm just unclear what > advantage branching 1.5 (and, as a result, making trunk 1.6hg) would have at > this time. > -Evan > > +1 > As for testing, this is why we're trying to set up nightly builds for > n-branches. > > Test build *availability* is not the problem with branches. It's that you > have to pick which single feature you're going to live on. If people really > merge early, ok... but that defeats the stability goal. > David > > > My rationale was that, since we haven't worked out the details of a new > release process, we should continue on as usual until such time. > > That said, this is probably a good opportunity to bring the topic up again… > For those who weren't at the meeting last week (or need a refresher), take a > look at some of the discussion. > [http://trac.adium.im/attachment/wiki/AdiumMeetings/2011-08-30/Adium%20meeting%20log%20August%2030%2C%202010.txt > starting at line 120] > > Thoughts? Counter-suggestions? Hurtful words about my mother? > -Eric > (Yes, I'm linking to the log because I don't feel like typing it all out > again right now…)
...Anyone? Anyone? *crickets*
