On Sep 6, 2011, at 6:26 PM, Stephen Holt wrote: > > On Sep 6, 2011, at 6:18 PM, Evan Schoenberg, M.D. wrote: > >> >> On Sep 6, 2011, at 7:01 PM, David Smith wrote: >> >>> I disagree. The concept of "trunk" focuses testing a lot. I know when >>> we had a few feature branches going I immediately set up my own branch >>> that I merged them all to so I could test more than one thing at once. >> >> Branch early, merge early may be a fine approach. I'm just unclear what >> advantage branching 1.5 (and, as a result, making trunk 1.6hg) would have at >> this time. >> >> -Evan > > > +1 > > As for testing, this is why we're trying to set up nightly builds for > n-branches. > > I think a great goal would be to have trunk releasable at any arbitrary time, > provided a period for localization and beta testing.
FWIW this is totally doable right now -- have to edit a single file. It's on my to do list to move that stuff in to a more easily accessed location. I'll commit to taking care of it this week or weekend sometime. (For real.)
