**>From: "fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
**>To: "devel" <[email protected]>
**>Subject: Re: resubmit your dbm/gdbm-based DLR storage patch and vote to phase
**> out internal DLR storage in favor of DBM DLR storage
**>Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:34:54 +1100
[ ... lines deleted ... ]
**>Dave i'm just updating my code to work with a version of the latest kannel -
**>a painful process of merging our differences (not just gdbm,
**>thats easy as the dlr storage is as best virtualized as C can do), and a
**>routine to find old orphaned records,
**> so if you can wait just a bit...
**>Cheers
**>fred
No problem waiting. Just wanted to make sure your contribution was
looked at again since:
1) Kannel can now easily support it with the UUID as the key
2) Fits in very well with the standard DLR storage concept
3) Is a much better alternative to the internal in-bearerbox's memory
DLR store
4) Makes my life simpler for coding my statusbox ;-)
See ya...
d.c.
