Hi, fred wrote:
> "> I'm really -1 for dropping internal dlr storage. bdb or gdbm may be > overkill >> for small setups and forces external dependency (with is the goal why we >> support mysql/pgsql/oracle). user should decide which one to use w/o >> forcing them to install yet another database just to be able to use >> dlr's. > " > surely we have it configurable as to which storage mechanism we use, we > are not > forced to install yet another db if we don't want. and theres no need > to drop one thats there. So as default, keeping the internal mem one is > ok. As for external dependency, dbm or gdbm has a dependency > on a library, so do the other that are already there oracle,mysql etc, > so the truth! what is the problem? the problem is described above. I'm +1 for dbm/gdbm as optional module but -1 for dropping internal dlr support. that's it... -- Thanks, Alex
