Is there any plans in supporting SQLite? It's also file based, very fast, embeddable, open source, self contained and well documented.
Migrating from the code from MySQL shouldn't pose too many problems, I suppose... Regards, On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:46:46 +0800, Davy Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > **>From: "fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > **>To: "devel" <[email protected]> > **>Subject: Re: resubmit your dbm/gdbm-based DLR storage patch and vote to > phase > **> out internal DLR storage in favor of DBM DLR storage > **>Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:34:54 +1100 > > [ ... lines deleted ... ] > > **>Dave i'm just updating my code to work with a version of the latest kannel > - > **>a painful process of merging our differences (not just gdbm, > **>thats easy as the dlr storage is as best virtualized as C can do), and a > **>routine to find old orphaned records, > **> so if you can wait just a bit... > **>Cheers > **>fred > > No problem waiting. Just wanted to make sure your contribution was > looked at again since: > > 1) Kannel can now easily support it with the UUID as the key > 2) Fits in very well with the standard DLR storage concept > 3) Is a much better alternative to the internal in-bearerbox's memory > DLR store > 4) Makes my life simpler for coding my statusbox ;-) > > See ya... > > d.c. > > -- Alejandro Guerrieri Magicom http://www.magicom-bcn.net/
