the problem is described above. I'm +1 for dbm/gdbm as optional module but -1 for dropping internal dlr support. that's it...
agree'ing here to Alex. Same with me.
Internal storage is something "weak" in terms of message loose while restart/shutdown. But it's up to the user if he wants persistance or now, and is willing to pay for the performance trade-off.
Even while I can understand Davy's point too. Actually dbm routines are present at any modern-time POSIX system (even on Cygwin ;) and a logical switch to a per-default persistant DLR storage type may be an option.
More opinions and discussion please on this one. I'm struggling with arguments from Alex (more dependancy) and Davy (more default persistance with on-board libs like dbm).
Stipe
mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 D�sseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0 fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de http://www.wapme-systems.de/ -------------------------------------------------------------------
