On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Michael Zervakis <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe that this parameter should be set optimally at msec and not sec to > handle throttling rates such as 100 messages per sec., because for each > second we sleep after receiving 0x58 we lose the opportunity to transfer > these 100 messages, and transmission rate is reduced significantly.
Maybe the "optimal" solution here is (starting for SMPP_THROTTLING_MIN_TIME) increase that delay with some sort of exponential growth until you reach the max defined value. M
