Too much fuss. Is all this justifiable? Is this so essential that we cannot
live without? Consider the burden on the code. Kannel is already sluggish as
it is.
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Conte Mac Donell" <[email protected]>
To: "Michael Zervakis" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: Please have a look at this patch adding option to configure
SMPP throttling sleep time
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Michael Zervakis <[email protected]>
wrote:
I believe that this parameter should be set optimally at msec and not sec
to
handle throttling rates such as 100 messages per sec., because for each
second we sleep after receiving 0x58 we lose the opportunity to transfer
these 100 messages, and transmission rate is reduced significantly.
Maybe the "optimal" solution here is (starting for
SMPP_THROTTLING_MIN_TIME) increase that delay with some sort of
exponential growth until you reach the max defined value.
M
