On 11 August 2017 at 00:08, Petr Viktorin <pvikt...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 08/10/2017 04:52 AM, Scott Talbert wrote: >> I'll plan on fixing wxPython myself, but you may want to look into why it >> wasn't on the list as there may be others. > > Thanks for noticing! > > Unfortunately, I don't know of a good way to automatically tell if a package > contains a Python module, or if it's an application that just happens to use > Python.
While I've never actually tried it, it seems the metadata files used for "whatprovides" reverse lookups might help: 1. Find all RPMs that drop files into '/usr/lib64/python2.7/' or '/usr/lib/python2.7/' 2. Categorise as a Python library if they *don't* drop files into "/usr/bin" 3. Categorise as a Python library if there's an RPM that drops similar files into the python3.6 lib directories 4. Categorise as an application if neither 2 nor 3 apply If it works in practice, such an approach would also help pick up cases like libvirt-python, where a Py3 RPM exists, but isn't called "python3-<name>". Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
