On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 11:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 17:55 +0000, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > We didn't specifically rule on the naming, FWIW. As far as IM7 > > being the > > variant package, we mostly ruled that for F27, nothing using IM in > > the > > release blocking media may require IM7. I'm personally neutral on > > how the > > files and packages are named as long as the implementation > > accomplishes > > that goal. > > well, okay, fine, I guess *technically* we could make ImageMagick be > 7 > and have ImageMagick6 and change the requirements in every single > package that currently requires ImageMagick.
That is the point, how many package fail to build with ImageMagick7 ? we "just" need change requires on FTBFS packages (with ImageMagick7) > But...let's not do that? > :) -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
