On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 16:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 20:07 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > That is the point, how many package fail to build with ImageMagick7 > > ? > > we "just" need change requires on FTBFS packages (with > > ImageMagick7) > > No it isn't the point. More things actually use the ImageMagick *CLI* > than use the library, and the CLI of ImageMagick 7 is very different > from the CLI of ImageMagick 6. This is the *main* reason we do not > just > want to make the ImageMagick package suddenly become ImageMagick 7 - > because IM 7 does not provide the CLI people currently expect from > the > package called 'ImageMagick'. It's not primarily about things which > build against the libraries.
OK, I understood your point of view and I change my opinion to youropinion . Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
