On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:15 +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Rex Dieter <rdie...@math.unl.edu> wrote:
> > Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > > First question, why "arch" and "scenario" are x86_64, but the error
> > > concerns the 32-bit build? Since OpenBabel exists on all arches, why
> > > do I get this particular error message?
> >
> > Your package is multilib'd?
>
> No, I don't think it is.
>
>
> > > I have removed and reinstalled molsketch on both i686 and x86_64 with
> > > no errors from dnf
> >
> > and openbable is not multilib'd, that's the problem.
> >
> > Why do you have an explicit dep? Why is it arch'd?
> >
> > If you sure it's still needed, a simple:
> > Requires: openbabel
> >
> > should suffice.
>
> OpenBabel is a runtime dependency for some optional features of
> Molsketch. The %{_isa} macro got added during the review, I had asked
> about it, but completely forgot it while we were trying to figure out
> some other stuff. Is this technically wrong or is dist.rpmdeplint
> being overzealous here?
We did have a similar case of cross-arch oddness in rpmdeplint which I
think turned out to be something extremely non-obvious:
https://pagure.io/taskotron/task-rpmdeplint/issue/9
CCing kparal.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
