> > There's a lot of clouds going to uEFI now > > [citation needed] ... > I got sort of lost in Azure versus Hyper-V and gen1/gen2 - apparently Hyper-V > likes > UEFI and supports secure boot but Azure may not or something?
Ignoring the question of how many is a lot, I think you may just be discussing the difference between the first gen and current gen Azure cloud. They definitely support UEFI, at least in some configuration. > > The other advantage of having a uEFI partition is you can boot one > > image on hardware and VM, I'm planning that with IoT. > > I later found out that some OpenStack installations like to do this too. > > So...I agree we should probably do this, particularly if Ubuntu already is > today. The annoying thing about the hybrid strategy is it means keeping grub-install around for BIOS. But that means it has to be on the thing making images, not in the image itself. -- Peter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NSLCXQWNAZUSHCBJ25G3BZGMFDZ6TJPO/
