* Miro Hrončok: > Recently, a couple hundred packages were retired from rawhide (Fedora > 31 at that time) based on the Fedora Failed to Build From Source > Policy . From various reactions over several threads it seems this > policy is not ideal. This is an attempt to collect feedback and make > the policy better serve Fedora's needs.
Debian treats FTBFS bugs as release-critical. They either have to be fixed, or the package gets removed from the release. However, this is not an automated process. I wonder if something similar could work for Fedora: The package would remain available in rawhide, but would be removed from the release composes. In the end, someone has to fix the packages eventually, and the package maintainers are probably best qualified to deal with that. If they lack the resources for that, it points to a much more significant problem that needs solving separately, I think. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://email@example.com