On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 09:02, Remi Collet <fed...@famillecollet.com> wrote:
>
> Le 26/09/2019 à 11:36, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
> > Here is what the vision we came to and that we would like to discuss:
> >
> > ○ Every changes to dist-git is done via pull-requests
>
> IMHO Have to stay optional, making this mandatory being a terrible headache.
>

I am going to agree in that it seems to go against what a large number
of packagers do currently to try and deal with the number of branches
and packages they try to keep up with. I say this from breaking their
workflow with EPEL-8 and getting an earful or two.

The workflow they follow is:
0. Go to first package in list
A. Make a change in master
B. Push that change
C. fedpkg switch-branch <first on N branches>
D. some variant of 'git merge master', 'git checkout master (some
flags I forget)', etc
E. fedpkg push
F. fedpkg build
G. fedpkg update
H. Iterate branch and GOTO C.
I. Iterate package and GOTO 0.

They might be doing that for FN-1, FN, FN+1, rawhide, and possibly
EPEL-6,7,8 so 7 branches. They can't do it with 8 because we added a
file which causes conflicts and they don't want to deal with pull
requests or anything like that. Some do this for dozens to hundreds of
packages. Now I am the first that is probably too many packages but it
is also one of those if they drop them then all of them go away.


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to