On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 02:33:15PM -0700, Christoph Junghans wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:37 AM Dan Horák <d...@danny.cz> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:28:10 -0700 > > Christoph Junghans <jungh...@votca.org> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > >> In your case procps-ng package seems to be miscompiled (or run on > > > >> an incopatible hardware). I recommend getting a shell in the mock > > > >> enviroment (mock --shell) and investigeting whether the ps program > > > >> works there). > > > > > > > > Ok, I will try that and report back. > > > It is indeed broken in shell as well: > > > <mock-chroot> sh-5.0# ps > > > > > > Signal 4 (ILL) caught by ps (3.3.15). > > > /usr/bin/ps:ps/display.c:66: please report this bug > > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > > > works (no crash) on my Power9 system, but it could be a P9 instruction > > sneaked into the binary and crashing on Power8 systems. I'll take a > > look, but if you could file a bug (with me in CC), it would be helpful. > just to make sure, I am running this in mock on the following system: > $ cat /proc/cpuinfo > processor : 0 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 6 > model : 142 > model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7567U CPU @ 3.50GHz
Then you actually run the PowerPC ps binary in QEMU emulator. Could you show the /proc/cpuinfo from inside of the mock environment? -- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
