On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:14 AM Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:06 PM Ian McInerney <ian.s.mciner...@ieee.org> > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 8:37 PM Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> With the fedora 32 release drawing near, it might be a good time to > >> check if any of your packages still have broken dependencies in the > >> fedora 32 (+testing) repositories. I've been working on just the thing > >> you need: > >> > > (snip) > > > It would be interesting to also extend this to allow querying based on > broken "requires" tags, since those can make packages uninstallable. > > That's exactly what's already listed in the report. For source > packages, it shows broken dependencies that make them non-buildable > (FTBFS - fails to build from sources), and for binary packages, it > shows broken dependencies that make then non-installable (FTI - fails > to install). > > Fabio > > Ah, I missed the part about FTI. I thought it was only FTBFS. Sorry for the noise. -Ian
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
