Le lundi 09 mars 2020 à 12:11 -0500, Bruno Wolff III a écrit : > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 18:11:32 +0100, > Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:57 PM Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> > > wrote: > > > > I'm also not sure how you would detect that from the package > > metadata > > ... query all packages for their file contents, and then show > > conflicts when two packages own the same file, but do not > > explicitly > > Conflict? I think that's probably too simplistic ... > > I don't think that practice is banned currently, but it would > probably > cut down on mistakes if it were. Having two sources of truth that > are > supposed to be identical, makes it easy for people to make a mistake.
That works fine as long as the packages are generated from the same srpm. Here you have a case where files were moved from one project to another, so the maintainers need to decide which is the canonical truth from now on. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
