On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 9:51 am, Stephen John Smoogen
<smo...@gmail.com> wrote:
Those pages are needing some love and care as aarch64 should not be
on it anymore. Currently the primary architectures that Fedora builds
against are
[smooge@batcave01 32]$ ls -l Workstation/
total 12
drwxr-xr-x. 3 263 263 4096 2020-04-23 00:09 aarch64/
drwxr-xr-x. 3 263 263 4096 2020-04-22 22:27 armhfp/
drwxr-xr-x. 3 263 263 4096 2020-04-22 23:08 x86_64/
So we used to distinguish between primary and secondary architectures
in that package maintainers were responsible for primary architectures
and architecture teams were responsible for secondary architectures.
Now, all architectures are built on koji and all builds have to
succeed. So we're forced to care about ppc64le and s390x whether you
call them "primary" or not. Is it still a useful distinction to have?
The workstation image for armhfp is stored in
[smooge@batcave01 releases]$ ls -1
32/Workstation/armhfp/images/Fedora-Workstation-*
32/Workstation/armhfp/images/Fedora-Workstation-32-1.6-armhfp-CHECKSUM
32/Workstation/armhfp/images/Fedora-Workstation-armhfp-32-1.6-sda.raw.xz
OK, that's extremely confusing. I assumed ARM was no longer supported
because it's not found on alt.fedoraproject.org. I'm not sure if
removing architectures from there is a good idea. Anyway, OK then, I
guess I still have to care about it. :)
Why do we call it armv7hl on koji but armhfp for the download images?
Consistent terminology would be nice.
Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
