On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 03:40, Sergio Belkin <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, I strongy disagree whit this move. > In fact on of the things that I hate of Debian/Ubuntu is the choice of nano > and the poor version that they offer by default of vi. > More friendly for end-users? Really? > Please thinking so, the end-user use GUI's. Nano has no any significative > advantage over vi and even lesser over vim. What's the wrong with vim? Really > I don't understand. > If one end-user wants to use a text editor, he will find kate, gedit and the > like better options.
Your argument works best the other way around: if a developer wants to use another text editor, they'll know the options, they'll know how to change it much better than an end-user. As a vim user for many years, my +1000 to this change proposal. -- Iñaki Úcar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
