On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:13:36PM +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:

> I (strongly) support the renaming of the branch, but I really
> really would prefer there to be a rough consensus on the
> replacement name across the entire git community, so
> that I don't need to remember to git-checkout devel in one
> project, git-checkout trunk in another, git-checkout main in
> a third, git-checkout release in a fourth, git-checkout default
> in a fifth, etc.(*).  In this case, I would prefer Fedora follow
> the rough consensus presuming that one can be achieved
> rather than pick yet another (different) name.

There are several other branches than the branch for Rawhide that have a
name that is unlikely to be found in many other projects like f32, el6,
epel7, epel8-playground. Why is it more intuitive to use a name from
other projects as the name for the branch for Rawhide?

devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 

Reply via email to