On 29 Sep 2020, at 22:04, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:51 pm, Petr Menšík <pemen...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Anyway, we might forgive working dnssec validation. What we cannot >> forgive is lack of DNSSEC information passtrough in 2020. > > I agree this should be fixed. See > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879028. > > However, since this only matters for specialized server deployments, and will > not matter for desktop usage or most server deployments, and since the > workaround is very easy (just edit /etc/resolv.conf) it's really extreme to > suggest it should be a release blocker when we have one week to go before > final freeze. That timeframe is way too tight. To step in here, regulatory compliance is a non optional requirement around the world. Regulatory compliance applies to everybody in a jurisdiction, there is no such thing as a “specialized deployment” or environments where it “will not matter”. Compliance doesn’t care about an arbitrary freeze. This is not a technical decision. Regards, Graham — _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
