On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 at 09:41, Roberto Ragusa <m...@robertoragusa.it> wrote:
> On 2/7/21 12:16 PM, drago01 wrote: > > > > On Sunday, February 7, 2021, Roberto Ragusa <m...@robertoragusa.it > <mailto:m...@robertoragusa.it>> wrote: > > > > It can only be an alternative, not a replacement, since it is > dropping features: > > > > «In particular, no attempt is made to measure the cache and main > memory speed, > > or to identify and report the DRAM type.» > > > > > > Which is nice to have but not really the point of a memory tester ... > > I'm pointing out that memtest86+ is not just a memory tester. > Is there any other tool covering that functionality? > > Probably not because for more and more modern hardware it gets harder and harder to get that information. Heck even 'testing' memory is hard enough these days because a lot of hardware is built around covering up any problem with the hardware because it is expected to fail and the hardware itself will see that, mark it bad and set something else up as good. -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
