On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 22:48, Joe Doss <j...@solidadmin.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:45 AM Clement Verna
> > <cve...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >> I think this is the fundamental difference here, Fedora CoreOS does
> >> not have a version number. It has 3 streams, stable, testing and
> >> next, these streams are based on a version of Fedora Linux but that
> >> should just be a detail that most end users should not have to care
> >> about.
>
> I disagree here. Fedora CoreOS has the Fedora name in it and it should
> have the same fundamental features and changes that ship with each
> Fedora release. To say it doesn't have a base version and that users
> shouldn't care about it is pretty dismissive.
>

Sorry if that sounded dismissive, but that's really how I feel. I recognize
that I have a bias towards thinking that most FCOS users are similar to my
profile.
I am a developer and I don't have a strong interest in the OS, I just
expect it to work and provide me the tools needed to do my job. To me
that's the beauty of FCOS, I get a solid, tested OS that get automated
updates and just works, I honestly don't care to know which version of
Fedora Linux it is based on or which features it has. I want to spin-up an
instance make sure that my application works and forget about it.
I also understand that there are other type of users that will care much
more about the base OS than me:-).


>
> >> Another difference is that Fedora CoreOS has automatic updates and
> >> if we want our users to trust these automatic updates we need them
> >> to be rock solid. This leads to Fedora CoreOS being more
> >> conservative on how changes are rolled out to users, taking the
> >> example rolling out cgroups v2 in the Fedora 31 time frame would
> >> have broken all users that are using Docker to run their containers
> >> and this was not acceptable :-).
> >>
> >> If some users are getting confused and get curious about why there
> >> are these differences and learn more about how Fedora CoreOS works,
> >> that's a good thing IMO :-)
>
> Confusing and frustrating your users is a bad thing.
>

> On 5/19/21 6:54 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > No. This is a cop-out and a bad answer. The reason this happened is
> > because Fedora CoreOS historically has not participated in the
> > development of Fedora Linux, including the Changes process, and
> > generally rolled back features instead of adapting with them during
> > the development cycle.
> >
> > It's not like making changes and breaking upgrades is acceptable in
> > Fedora Linux either. It's just that the Fedora CoreOS WG has not
> > participated in the main development process and rolled back changes
> > instead of adapting to them, which has frustrated pretty much
> > everyone. The containers team in particular was extremely unhappy to
> > find out cgroup v1 was still used in FCOS. I was pretty cheesed off
> > when I discovered the sqlite rpmdb feature was rolled back in FCOS.
> >
> > In general, I'm not pleased with how Fedora CoreOS does this.
> > Hopefully they will do better in the future.
>
> I'll echo Neal's sentiment here. This is a cop-out and bad answer.
>

> It is frustrating to consume FCOS only to see features that are in the
> current release of Fedora are rolled back. Even in today's FCOS WG
> meeting I brought up adding in zswap to FCOS and it is shelved until
> Kubernetes adds for support swap enabled systems.
>
> The RHCOS and Openshift teams should be back porting these breaking
> changes, so FCOS can look to the future with Fedora. FCOS should not be
> shackled by limits imposed by RHCOS/Openshift/Kubernetes.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> --
> Joe Doss
> j...@solidadmin.com
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to