On 5/20/21 12:13 PM, Ron Olson wrote: > If I may, I think the issue is right there in the name: Fedora CoreOS. The > Fedora name brings some expectations and it seems CoreOS, by its nature, > can’t be at parity with the other Fedora flavors and that leads to confusion. > I can attest that I was surprised when I learned Fedora CoreOS didn’t support > cgroups v2 and that confused me; it’s Fedora, of course it would have the > latest-n-greatest.
One clarification here.. It does support cgroups v2, it's just not enabled by default. It's just a kernel parameter. Specifically for cgroups v2, the default is changing here in the next month. So FCOS will default to cgroups v2. We're trying to make sure users have a good experience. Docker users are a big part of that. Changing the default before Docker supported cgroups v2 was really not an option for us at the time. > > I used CoreOS before it bought by RH, and I could accept whatever limitations > it had because there were no expectations. Here’s a specialized distro that > does things in its own way. > > I’m guessing this is laughably not possible, but I’m going to suggest anyway > that maybe it be renamed either back to simply “CoreOS” or something new like > “Bowler” or whatever that indicates that it is its own special thing and > expectations can be set accordingly. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
