On Sat, 2022-08-06 at 17:19 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > But I don't think it makes sense to try to delay this. rpmautospec > is already widely used: > $ rg -l '%autochangelog|%autorelease' *.spec | wc -l > 2973 > So any shortcomings are already being felt by packagers.
I use it in some packages, but I've also specifically *stopped* using it in other packages because of several issues (which I think were among those Miro listed). I share Miro's concern that it may not be robust enough to be the Recommended Way yet, and its maintenance does not seem strong enough. If there's significant progress on fixing the issues I'll try switching more packages over to it again, though. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
