OK, thanks for the heads-up. I didn't notice this because I was looking
at the GNOME build rules, where evolution-data-server does not yet
depend on it. We'll need to coordinate with you to ensure the 2.38 ->
2.40 update goes smoothly, then. I don't expect this to be difficult:
it should be simple changes only. Just need to be sure WebKitGTK,
Builder, evolution-data-server, and gnome-initial-setup are all bundled
into the same bodhi update.
On Tue, Sep 20 2022 at 05:05:38 PM +0200, Milan Crha <mc...@redhat.com>
wrote:
Thus some upstream changes will be needed there too. The transition
will be painful, if the upstream is supposed to support both naming-s.
No, there will be zero upstream support for webkit2gtk-5.0: it is
actually already gone, replaced by webkitgtk-6.0. webkit2gtk-5.0 is was
a WIP/unstable/development API, and 2.38 will be the last release with
it available. I wanted to stabilize it in time for 2.38, but failed.
I am pretty sure that webkitgtk-6.0 will be stable in time for 2.40,
though. I'm actively working on this now. The goal will be to provide
API and ABI stability for as long as possible, same as webkit2gtk-4.0
and webkit2gtk-4.1.
Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
