V Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 04:46:06PM -0800, Adam Williamson napsal(a): > On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 13:59 +0100, Jiri Kucera wrote: > > Thanks for the reminder Petr. I will do the rebase in rawhide only then. > > Thanks for taking care of these dependencies and announcing the bump. > > For extra bonus points :D, if it's not too much trouble, it would be > great if you could do this on a side tag in future - yes, even for > Rawhide. Without a side tag and combined update, the openQA tests for > the gpgme update fail: > https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?version=38&groupid=2&build=Update-FEDORA-2022-603eea89a3&distri=fedora > if the gpgme bump and all dependent rebuilds were in the same update, > the tests would pass (assuming nothing's actually broken). > > Right now we're not gating Rawhide updates on test failures, but I do > check them all, so I had to make sure all the rebuilds had actually > been done, then add comments noting the tests need to be re-run after > the next Rawhide compose, then remember to re-run them so all that ugly > red ink goes away :D If/when we do start gating Rawhide on openQA > failures, this update would be blocked by gating. > There is already a dedicated test for checking RPM dependencies called fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional which caught the breakage <https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-603eea89a3>:
Dependency problems with repos: nothing provides libqgpgme.so.7 needed by kdepim-addons-22.08.3-1.fc38.i686 nothing provides libqgpgme.so.7 needed by kf5-libkleo-22.08.3-1.fc38.i686 nothing provides libqgpgme.so.7 needed by kf5-mailcommon-22.08.3-1.fc38.i686 nothing provides libqgpgme.so.7 needed by kf5-messagelib-22.08.3-1.fc38.i686 nothing provides libqgpgme.so.7 needed by kget-libs-22.08.3-1.fc38.i686 nothing provides libqgpgme.so.7 needed by kleopatra-libs-22.08.3-1.fc38.i686 nothing provides libqgpgme.so.7 needed by kmail-libs-22.08.3-1.fc38.i686 Unfortunatelly, the results do not affect gating by default. Actually a build whose CI is half red, as you can see on the link, should not have been pushed even to Rawhide. -- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
