Hmm, concerning `libphonenumber` there is no Java binding, only the C++
port of the original Java library. Moreover, nothing Java-related is
distributed in the RPMs. That means that `BuildRequires: java-devel` is
redundant here. I will try to do a scratch build.
Regards,
Jiri
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 9:25 PM Jiri Kucera <jkuc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Yes, builds in [1] were built with the `f38-build-side-60497` side tag. In
> [1] there are two errors that were not here in time I hit the submit button
> (maybe I should wait a bit longer):
> * `nothing provides libqgpgme.so.7 needed by
> kdepim-addons-22.08.3-1.fc38.i686` - this one was
> caused by not building `kdepim-addons` on `i686` since missing
> `libphonenumber` on `i686`.
> `libphonenumber` is not built for `i686` anymore due to `ExclusiveArch:
> %{java_arches}`. This
> can be fixed by skipping building the Java binding for `i686` only.
> * ```
> Undeclared file conflicts:
> kleopatra-*.i686 provides ... which is also provided by
> kleopatra-*.x86_64
> ...
> kmail-*.i686 provides ... which is also provided by kmail-*.x86_64
> ...
> ```
> These must have appeared also in the update before, but I cannot find
> `rpmdeplint` tests
> here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-e8d23a026e
>
> I submitted [2] approx. 22h after [1] became stable. Have no idea why the
> builds from pre-[1] rawhide were picked up. However, `rpmdeplint`
> repoclosure failures are happening only on `i686` so maybe this is somehow
> connected with `kdepim-addons` not built for `i686`.
>
> Regards and sorry for the chaos,
> Jiri
>
> [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-4c1b011b1b
> [2] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-603eea89a3
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 11:54 AM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 02. 12. 22 1:46, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 13:59 +0100, Jiri Kucera wrote:
>> >> Thanks for the reminder Petr. I will do the rebase in rawhide only
>> then.
>> >
>> > Thanks for taking care of these dependencies and announcing the bump.
>> >
>> > For extra bonus points :D, if it's not too much trouble, it would be
>> > great if you could do this on a side tag in future - yes, even for
>> > Rawhide. Without a side tag and combined update, the openQA tests for
>> > the gpgme update fail:
>> >
>> https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?version=38&groupid=2&build=Update-FEDORA-2022-603eea89a3&distri=fedora
>> > if the gpgme bump and all dependent rebuilds were in the same update,
>> > the tests would pass (assuming nothing's actually broken).
>> >
>> > Right now we're not gating Rawhide updates on test failures, but I do
>> > check them all, so I had to make sure all the rebuilds had actually
>> > been done, then add comments noting the tests need to be re-run after
>> > the next Rawhide compose, then remember to re-run them so all that ugly
>> > red ink goes away :D If/when we do start gating Rawhide on openQA
>> > failures, this update would be blocked by gating.
>>
>> Interesting. I saw
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-4c1b011b1b where
>> side tag
>> was used.
>>
>> Later, there was
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-603eea89a3
>> which only changed a small portion from the package.
>>
>> Why would the tests fails for the second update?
>>
>> --
>> Miro Hrončok
>> --
>> Phone: +420777974800
>> IRC: mhroncok
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
