On 4/16/25 5:58 AM, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote: > On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 18:21 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, 18:14 Stephen Smoogen <ssmoo...@redhat.com >> <mailto:ssmoo...@redhat.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com >>> <mailto:berra...@redhat.com>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:43:38AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Has anyone gone through the effort of removing i686 from a wide >>>> reaching >>>> > non-leaf package? Any advice appreciated >>>> >>>> Can we just stop building for i686 in Fedora in general, instead of >>>> burning >>>> maintainer time figuring out deps problems like this... ? What's the >>>> blocker and how much longer do we have to put up with its burden in >>>> Fedora ? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> The blocker is someone making a Change Request and then going to the >>> Fedora 43 CR meetings with FESCO :). I think the only blocker has >>> been Steam games. >> >> Steam is mostly a solved problem with the Steam Flatpak on Flathub. >> ("But boohoo, I want to use the RPM" - I don't care. Valve should make >> a 64-bit compatible client already, it's 2025.) > > > AFAIU Steam doesn't need qemu , I use steam package from RPMFusion , I > installed it in a chromebook (with intel CPU), I checked and I don't > have any qemu package installed
Steam was raised regarding "i686 in Fedora in general," not for qemu. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
