Hi Kaleb,

On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 03:02:33PM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 2:26 PM Mark Wielaard <m...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > It certainly looks that way. The ar format is not ideal to rewrite in
> > place, which is why it is unpacked and repacked like this. Which isn't
> > super efficient, but somewhat surprising it takes 20+ hours... That
> > must be a pretty big .a file.
> >
> 
> I don't even see any .a files in the three or four subpackages I looked at.

There is a libgdal.dll.a in the noarch mingw packages.
I dunno if that is the one that causes the issue yet though.

> > For now as workaround please add:
> > %undefine _preserve_static_debuginfo
> > to the spec file for now.
> 
> four of the five arches are done in the build that's running now. After 24
> hours.  i686 is the remaining arch.
> 
> I don't know if it's worth killing and restarting it at this point.

Probably not. But if you do a followup build please do include the
%undefine _preserve_static_debuginfo

Cheers,

Mark
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to