Miro Hrončok venit, vidit, dixit 2026-01-27 18:09:59: > On 27. 01. 26 17:36, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > Miro Hrončok venit, vidit, dixit 2026-01-27 09:54:46: > >> Dear maintainers. > >> > >> dtach lon > > > >> The following packages require above mentioned packages: > >> Depending on: dtach (4) > >> notmuch (maintained by: @epel-packagers-sig, mjg) > >> notmuch-0.39-13.fc44.src requires dtach, eclipseo, > >> gotmax23, rjarry) > > > > So, before trying to build dtach, I checked existing PRs: > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dtach/pull-request/1 > > > > And indeed, with this PR, dtach still builds today. Thanks to its > > author :) > > > > dtach upstream is in a somewhat sore state. notmuch uses it merely for > > testing the emacs interface. > > > > So, if someone could merge and build that PR please ... For easy merging > > I'll rebase it on top of the two nop commits (F43, F44 mass rebuilds). > > Would be so much easier with autorelease. > > I guess a provenpackager merge and build that PR, but isn't this a symptom of > a > nonrepsonsive maintainer?
I'd say a responsive proven packager is quicker than a non-responsive maintainer process ... I admit I missed the chance to set needinfo etc, summing up to 8 weeks but leading to orphanage. The nrm process is shorter, it seems. But oh well ... We don't even have F44 FTBFS bugs filed, do we? Michael -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
