On 27. 01. 26 18:32, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Miro Hrončok venit, vidit, dixit 2026-01-27 18:09:59:
On 27. 01. 26 17:36, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Miro Hrončok venit, vidit, dixit 2026-01-27 09:54:46:
Dear maintainers.
dtach lon
The following packages require above mentioned packages:
Depending on: dtach (4)
notmuch (maintained by: @epel-packagers-sig, mjg)
notmuch-0.39-13.fc44.src requires dtach, eclipseo, gotmax23,
rjarry)
So, before trying to build dtach, I checked existing PRs:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dtach/pull-request/1
And indeed, with this PR, dtach still builds today. Thanks to its
author :)
dtach upstream is in a somewhat sore state. notmuch uses it merely for
testing the emacs interface.
So, if someone could merge and build that PR please ... For easy merging
I'll rebase it on top of the two nop commits (F43, F44 mass rebuilds).
Would be so much easier with autorelease.
I guess a provenpackager merge and build that PR, but isn't this a symptom of a
nonrepsonsive maintainer?
I'd say a responsive proven packager is quicker than a non-responsive
maintainer process ...
I admit I missed the chance to set needinfo etc, summing up to 8 weeks
but leading to orphanage.
The nrm process is shorter, it seems. But oh well ... We don't even have
F44 FTBFS bugs filed, do we?
We have the f43 and f42 ones.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
Fedora Matrix: mhroncok
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
