On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Adam Miller wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
According to what is written here
https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/wiki/Features-Considered-for-Dropping
history function will likely be dropped.
From my POV history feature is very useful. Is there a plan to provide
history function in Fedora dnf if yum gets dropped?
Hi Michal,
Thanks for pointing this out. I considered history a candidate for
dropping because I didn't realize people had usecases for it. It is not
present in the early versions of DNF but I will make sure to put it back
in later.
Just to add my voice to the choir, I use it extensively and I suspect
many others in QA group too. It's extremely useful when trying to
determine exactly what update caused a given problem.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
+1 - I too use the history function of yum quite a bit.
And it is an absolutely critical component for sysadmin-side of things.
Being able to quickly search to see when/who/what messed with pkg X makes
tracking down changes a lot simpler.
-sv
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
