On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
>
> Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
>
> According to what is written here
> https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/wiki/Features-Considered-for-Dropping
> history function will likely be dropped.
>
> From my POV history feature is very useful. Is there a plan to provide
> history function in Fedora dnf if yum gets dropped?
>
Hi Michal,
Thanks for pointing this out. I considered history a candidate for
dropping because I didn't realize people had usecases for it. It is not
present in the early versions of DNF but I will make sure to put it back
in later.
Just to add my voice to the choir, I use it extensively and I suspect
many others in QA group too. It's extremely useful when trying to
determine exactly what update caused a given problem.
Maybe a "yum history bisect" would be a neat feature?
-Angus
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
