Hi
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Debarshi Ray <rishi...@lostca.se> wrote: > > Ok. > > <sarcasm> > So what is the next step? Offering another kernel? Or allowing us to choose > a different package manager or packing format? Oh, wait, using multiple > different depsolvers has already been frowned upon. > > Now why did *that* happen? It is Fedora, isn't it? > </sarcasm> > Sarcasm isn't going to resolve the problems. If you have a proposal, let's hear it. Removing all the alternatives isn't an option. Is it? > > Go-oo is entirely irrelevant to Fedora. > > No, it is not. It is an important part of where LO came from. > Users don't care where LO comes from at all. > > I see. So how will you empower users to make an informed decision to choose > LO over AOO or the other way around? > > Refer to my first post. > And it will be the "default" until someone gets the bright idea of creating > an AOO spin, and that idea has already started floating around. I don't expect this to happen, realistically speaking but regardless of that, spins don't change the default. What we have as default is the single ISO in the fedoraproject.org page Rahul
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
