On 12/14/2013 03:27 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec, 2013 at 13:41:55 GMT, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Yea, I suspect both could be combined though in a script that gradually
adds new BRs to a package and then iterates over adding and removing BRs
until it produces equivalent output (not identical as thats kinda hard
to verify and achieve, but same provides/requires of resulting packages
and same filelist at least).
What about BRs which are needed, but the script removes because of
transitive dependencies? IMO, BuildRequires: foo-devel getting you
bar-devel, which is also needed, without listing bar-devel means you now
depend on foo-devel not losing that dependency.
--Ben
Right, but shouldn't that then lead to the package building fine but the
binary packages would miss some requires?
Or am i missing something here?
Thanks & regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services | Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch <pknir...@redhat.com>
Wankelstrasse 5 | Web: http://www.redhat.com/
D-70563 Stuttgart, Germany
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
