-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/2014 09:06 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Stephen Gallagher > <sgall...@redhat.com> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 03/03/2014 08:51 AM, Ric Wheeler wrote: >>> On 03/03/2014 03:43 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>>> So if you were asking me "Are we removing btrfs from the >>>> install options completely?", the answer is a resounding >>>> "NO". However, if you're asking "Are we removing btrfs from >>>> the drop-down of simple-install layouts?", my personal >>>> recommendation is "yes". >>> <snip> > Ok I was just confused as I haven't done a normal install in a few > releases. So you can still get to btrfs going through some new > "custom layout" option but you want to remove the "install onto > btrfs" easy button in the normal guided option? I'm ok with this, > I just want to make sure that I/users don't have to jump through > icantbelieveitsnotbtr hoops to install onto btrfs. Thanks, >
Right, we're absolutely not adding any hoops to installing onto btrfs above and beyond what we do for, say, ext4. There would be one simple clickthrough "Just give me the defaults" or else "I'll set up my partitions how I want them". Btrfs would be no harder to select in that latter approach than any other FS. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlMUjzkACgkQeiVVYja6o6PzDwCgoAp8C2XJvpLTBPLIX+x/80jV XbYAoKyuaARmC0oLkAtBGyDyr2iIKsci =Qjpe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
