On Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 03:26, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Matthew Miller > <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: [...] > > But *that* said, the current packaging means that grub2 adds 70MB on > > disk — about 12% of the entire cloud image. I'm not saying grub2 is > > evil, just that this is a big portion of the gain and is worth > > attacking in order to reverse it. I talked briefly to Peter Jones and > > he says there's quite a bit which can be done there, if going back to > > extlinux doesn't seem like a viable option. > > These are needed on BIOS systems > grub2-tools is 7MiB
Installed size is actually 36MB. /usr/sbin/grub2-sparc64-setup is 2MB and probably doesn't work on anything else than ppc64(le). /usr/sbin/grub2-macbless is also 2MB and probably doesn't work on non-Macs > grub2 is 3.8MiB > > These are needed on UEFI systems > shim-signed is 633KiB > grub2-efi is 837KiB > > So, I'm not sure where 70MB is coming from. [...] Matt was talking about 70MB on disk (installed size), not rpm package size. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
