1. Don't spend months in deciding which one to choose.2. Don't loose the nice integration o svn with our TRAC. Independent on how good/fast the dVCS is, the way svn integrate with trac is a real time saver. Tracking bugs, linking to revisions and to the wiki are really important features to me, and I think that whatever our decision will be we should not lose this.
george. On Mar 24, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Roland Dreier wrote:
LWN.net has an interesting article about how Emacs chose a new version control system: <http://lwn.net/Articles/272011/> They were back in the CVS stone ages, but their main contenders were the same big three of distributed VCSs: git, hg and bzr. The article pulls out a couple of very good quotes from their discussion. The one that caught my eye was from Richard Stallman:We already know the most important thing about what we will find from a careful study of git, mercurial and Bzr. We will find that each has its advantages and disadvantages -- but none of them conclusive. Each will be preferred by some people, but any one of them would work outwell enough. - R. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
