2011/10/30 Sławomir Nizio <slawomir.ni...@sabayon.org>:
> Ebuild sorting done, commits "squased" into one and pushed to another
> branch, gentoo-squashed-merge (note how cool name). Need to do then
> other stuffs like with sets/*.

Nice!
Where's the new repo? I need to add it to cgit (and to build server
overlays, and to layman xml crapshit I guess)

>
> If someone has a suggestion on something, speak up!
>
> I'm confused with: sets and profile/updates - they refer to packages
> that are intended to be in these two overlays. Don't know if there's a
> single set that refers to packages from both, but there is such
> problem for profiles/updates files.

Keep profile/updates in both overlays, they will now live separate lifes :P

> - My idea about sets - KISS, remove em all from "for Gentoo" overlay
> driven by idea that if someone (the chroots?) has "for Sabayon"
> overlay attached, he has the "for Gentoo" one in use too. So if a set
> that is going to be in "for Sabayon" contains "app-misc/w00t" that has
> to be in "for Gentoo" and "app-misc/ugh" that has to be in the other
> one, all dependencies will be met. Unless PMs are more strict about
> this and require all packages in set to be in Portage or strictly the
> overlay the sets/blah file is in. Will test…

keep sets only in our overlay. It's just our stuff.

> - The second thingy, profile/updates. If say 3Q-1892 :P contains
> "app-misc/bleh" that is in "for Sabayon" and "app-misc/argh" that is
> in "for Gentoo"… I think those files should be split too (atoms moved
> to relevant directory) and PMs will be happy.
>


-- 
Fabio Erculiani


Reply via email to