On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 06:14:31PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: >On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 06:06:31PM -0500, Matt Wilson wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 05:48:36PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: >> > On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:01:01PM +0100, Fernando Herrera wrote: >> > >Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 04:15:15PM -0500, David Dawes escribi?: >> > > >> > >>So it's OK for Linux kernel developers to object to having a bug tracking >> > >>system imposed on them but not OK for XFree86 developers? If that's >> > >>what you're telling me, then I have nothing more to say on this topic. > >A note of clarification, > >The Linux kernel Bugzilla is optional for kernel developers. > >If someone is proposing that XFree86 developers _must_ use Bugzilla, >that's really not something that can be imposed. > >But if there are volunteers out there willing to maintain a bug >database, hey, "more power to 'em", right? Developers can always ignore >the Bugzilla, after all :) > And right now that is my inclination.
David -- David Dawes Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project www.XFree86.org/~dawes _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
