On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Daniel Stone wrote: >Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 07:25:54 +1100 >From: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" >Subject: Re: Another voice > >On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 01:55:51PM -0500, David Dawes scrawled: >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 12:43:55PM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote: >> >> >and that, many of them still are. Some of them have applied for >> >membership, and some of them have gotten membership. >> > >> >Right now, membership is somewhat unneeded for the most part of >> >course which IMHO helps things a lot. The opening up of this >> >> Membership is something unneeded for the whole part, not the most >> part. I don't know why membership is even being discussed any >> more. It's irrelevant now, isn't it? One of the big complaints >> has been that XFree86 has had the appearance of an exclusive club. >> Well, that has been addressed by effectively eliminating the club! >> Isn't that what the "Open Source Community" wanted? > >patches@, fixes@, core@, bod@ ...
Well, the latter 2 addresses are not things that are really useful to the public in any way. I'm not particularly sure what types of discussion happens on those lists (core, bod) but they are more organizational lists than something the public needs to see or would benefit from IMHO. The 2 patch lists I think there is a degree of benefit of making public, as I've said in a couple previous mails though. It's already been said however that making these public is undecided. Perhaps we should just wait and see what happens for a while. -- Mike A. Harris _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
