Hi, This is a tangentially related question, but is there any reason why anonymising addresses and telephone numbers via salted hash or otherwise wasn't considered for this data release? It'd be sufficient data to look to see if claims were at the same property or if properties were shared, though for issues like location of the house you'd need a postcode (or the first half).
Presumably it's something along the lines of it being too much effort given that the data is held in scanned images. Apologies if this has already been delt with. Thanks, Tim Matthew Somerville wrote: > paul perrin wrote: > >> Any way I grabbed a windows version of wget - ran it this morning >> stopped half way - then kicked it off again just now... and some of the >> PDFs have changed been updated between the two runs. >> > > Do you have an example of one that had been changed? The server is > giving out Last-Modified headers, so it should easily be possible to see > one that is "out of sequence" - e.g. all of Diane Abbott's are > Last-Modified Saturday around 6:30am GMT. > > ATB, > Matthew > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list [email protected] > Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: > https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public > _______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
